2007年5月29日星期二

我的Fellow关于Citizen Journalist的讲座

Multimedia expert points the way to new digital journalism

Posted Mon May 28, 16:20:48 PDT 2007

Newspapers and print journalists should embrace the opportunities for improvement the Internet provides, Stanford Knight Fellow R. Scott Horner said in a May 24 speech to the Paly Voice.

Horner, a multimedia editor for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel Times, visited Palo Alto High School's Web Journalism class the afternoon of May 24 and spoke about blogging, citizen journalism and other ways the Internet has changed the face of today's media.

Horner stressed the importance of citizen journalists' ability to react more quickly to events. He used the 2004 Asian tsunami disaster as an example.

"When the tsunami happened in Asia, most of the West didn't have any reporters on the ground, but citizens were there snapping photos and writing about it," Horner said. "We could go online and see pictures of the tsunami waves crashing before reporters from the mainstream media had even arrived."

Horner also stressed bloggers' abilities to facilitate interactive online discussions.

"With print journalism, it's one direction: 'I talk, you listen'" Horner said. "Blogging is two directions, with the readers commenting and the blogger responding."

Horner said many print reporters are uncomfortable with citizen journalism, but it is essential that they learn to collaborate with bloggers.

"Traditional journalists don't really like online journalism," Horner said. "They don't respect it, mostly because they don't understand it. The very word 'blogging' sends chills down the spines of print journalists. They think of bloggers as the enemy."

He illustrated print journalists' perception of the two sides of modern reporting with a spectrum. Star Trek's Captain Kirk was on one side, representing print journalists, and an alien on the opposite side represented bloggers. Ideally, Horner said, today's journalists should fall in the middle.

"I am trying to convince traditional journalists that blogging isn't the enemy," Horner said. "My hope is that journalists will stop thinking in the way that traditional journalists think: 'We are journalism gods, and we tell you what you know. Period.' Instead, they should think, 'We are in a community, covering the news and doing the best we can. We will open this up to the public for a sharing of information.'"

Horner brought up Center for Citizen Media Director Dan Gillmor's quote "My readers know more than I do" twice to emphasize the attitude print journalists should have toward citizen journalists.

"Traditionally, print reporters become experts on a topic and then write about it all," Horner said. "It is good today to realize our readers know more than we do. They are now the experts. The idea is to open up journalism to citizen experts who know and can report more than any single journalist could."

As for concerns about citizen journalists' credibility, Horner said newspapers should trust readers to judge the quality of reporting.

"We will always have wacky [blog] posts, but readers can decide what to read," Horner said. "We don't always have to be the judge or the ultimate decider."

Horner also discussed the greater transparency that the Internet affords modern media. He used the Spokesman Review, which streams a live video feed of its daily story-assignment meetings, and the News and Record Editor-in-Chief, who writes a blog, as examples of this.

"All of us today are starting to live our lives in a more transparent way (due to the Internet)," Horner said.

He said the News and Record Editor-in-Chief "doesn't just write about the news--he writes about how they cover the news. He lets everyone into that world."

Horner also offered suggestions for good blogging, which include using an authentic voice and conversational tone, as well as making the site interesting enough to generate discussion.

He said newspapers should show their commitment to blogs by linking to blogs or even allowing citizens to create their own blogs on newspapers' Web sites, as the Houston Chronicle does.

In addition, Horner discussed the impact mashups have on the online media. Mashups are Web applications that integrate features from different sources. He cited examples such as a New York Times commuter guide created during a transportation strike. The site combined Google Maps features with citizen journalism, Horner said.

Horner predicted that print newsrooms and online newsrooms, which most newspaper companies separate, will soon merge and begin even greater cooperation.

"More and more is going into the printroom, like blogging, photo essays and audio photo essays," Horner said.

Horner said that despite the impact of the Internet and declining newspaper circulation, he does not think online media will replace print media soon. This is because the majority of newspaper companies' revenue still come from print, not online, publications, Horner said.

"We can assume that sometime in the future we could just live online, but right now there are still people out there who read the paper and advertisers who run ads in the paper," Horner said. "As long as they're around, we'll have print newspapers."

Horner works in the print newsroom at the Sun-Sentinel Times adapting print graphics for the newspaper's Web site. He uses audio, animation and interactivity—all features only possible online.

He received Stanford's John S. Knight Fellowship for professional journalists for the 2006-2007 year.

不只是传媒遇到问题

Plunge in CD Sales Shakes Up Big Labels

Published: May 28, 2007

Correction Appended

“Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band,” the Beatles album often cited as the greatest pop recording in music history, received a thoroughly modern 40th-anniversary salute last week when singers on “American Idol” belted out their own versions of its songs live on the show’s season finale.

But off stage, in a sign of the recording industry’s declining fortunes, shareholders of EMI, the music conglomerate that markets “Sgt. Pepper” and a vast trove of other recordings, were weighing a plan to sell the company as its financial performance was weakening.

It’s a maddening juxtaposition for more than one top record-label executive. Music may still be a big force in pop culture — from “Idol” to the iPod — but the music business’s own comeback attempt is falling flat.

Even pop’s pioneers are rethinking their approach. As it happens, one of the performers on “Sgt. Pepper,” Paul McCartney, is releasing a new album on June 5. But Mr. McCartney is not betting on the traditional record-label methods: He elected to sidestep EMI, his longtime home, and release the album through a new arrangement with Starbucks.

It’s too soon to tell if Starbucks’ new label (a partnership with the established Concord label) will have much success in marketing CDs. But not many other players are.

Despite costly efforts to build buzz around new talent and thwart piracy, CD sales have plunged more than 20 percent this year, far outweighing any gains made by digital sales at iTunes and similar services. Aram Sinnreich, a media industry consultant at Radar Research in Los Angeles, said the CD format, introduced in the United States 24 years ago, is in its death throes. “Everyone in the industry thinks of this Christmas as the last big holiday season for CD sales,” Mr. Sinnreich said, “and then everything goes kaput.”

It’s been four years since the last big shuffle in ownership of the major record labels. But now, with the sales plunge dimming hopes for a recovery any time soon, there is a new game of corporate musical chairs afoot that could shake up the industry hierarchy.

Under the deal that awaits shareholder approval, London-based EMI agreed last week to be purchased for more than $4.7 billion by a private equity investor, Terra Firma Capital Partners, whose diverse holdings include a European waste-conversion business. Rival bids could yet surface — though the higher the ultimate price, the more pressure the owners will face to make dramatic cuts or sell the company in pieces in order to recoup their investment.

For the companies that choose to plow ahead, the question is how to weather the worsening storm. One answer: diversify into businesses that do not rely directly on CD sales or downloads. The biggest one is music publishing, which represents songwriters (who may or may not also be performers) and earns money when their songs are used in TV commercials, video games or other media. Universal Music Group, already the biggest label, became the world’s biggest music publisher on Friday after closing its purchase of BMG Music, publisher of songs by artists like Keane, for more than $2 billion.

Now both Universal and Warner Music Group are said to be kicking the tires of Sanctuary, an independent British music and artist management company whose roster includes Iron Maiden and Elton John. The owners of all four of the major record companies also recently have chewed over deals to diversify into merchandise sales, concert tickets, advertising and other fields that are not part of their traditional business.

Even as the industry tries to branch out, though, there is no promise of an answer to a potentially more profound predicament: a creative drought and a corresponding lack of artists who ignite consumers’ interest in buying music. Sales of rap, which had provided the industry with a lifeboat in recent years, fell far more than the overall market last year with a drop of almost 21 percent, according to Nielsen SoundScan. (And the marquee star 50 Cent just delayed his forthcoming album, “Curtis.”)

In other genres the picture is not much brighter. Fans do still turn out (at least initially) for artists that have managed to build loyal followings. The biggest debut of the year came just last week from the rock band Linkin Park, whose third studio album, “Minutes to Midnight,” sold an estimated 623,000 copies, according to Nielsen SoundScan data.

But very few albums have gained traction. And that is compounded by the industry’s core structural problem: Its main product is widely available free. More than half of all music acquired by fans last year came from unpaid sources including Internet file sharing and CD burning, according to the market research company NPD Group. The “social” ripping and burning of CDs among friends — which takes place offline and almost entirely out of reach of industry policing efforts — accounted for 37 percent of all music consumption, more than file-sharing, NPD said.

The industry had long pinned its hopes on making up some of the business lost to piracy with licensed digital sales. But those prospects have dimmed as the rapid CD decline has overshadowed the rise in sales at services like Apple’s iTunes. Even as music executives fret that iTunes has not generated enough sales, though, they gripe that it unfairly dominates the sale of digital music.

Partly out of frustration with Apple, some of the music companies have been slowly retreating from their longtime insistence on selling music online with digital locks that prevent unlimited copying. Their aim is to sell more music that can be played on Apple’s wildly popular iPod device, which is not compatible with the protection software used by most other digital music services. EMI led the reversal, striking a deal with Apple to offer its music catalog in the unrestricted MP3 format.

Some music executives say that dropping copy-restriction software, also known as digital-rights management, would stoke business at iTunes’ competitors and generate a surge in sales. Others predict it would have little impact, though they add that the labels squandered years on failed attempts to restrict digital music instead of converting more fans into paying consumers.

“They were so slow to react, and let things get totally out of hand,” said Russ Crupnick, a senior entertainment industry analyst at NPD, the research company. “They just missed the boat.”

Perhaps there is little to lose, then, in experimentation. Mr. McCartney, for example, may not have made it to the “American Idol” finale, but he too is employing thoroughly modern techniques to reach his audience.

Starbucks will be selling his album “Memory Almost Full” through regular music retail shops but will also be playing it repeatedly in thousands of its coffee shops in more than two dozen countries on the day of release. And the first music video from the new album had it premiere on YouTube. Mr. McCartney, in announcing his deal with Starbucks, described his rationale simply: “It’s a new world.”

Correction: May 30, 2007

An article in The Arts yesterday about the impact of plunging CD sales on big music companies and the companies’ efforts to sell more recordings misidentified the electronic file format in which Apple’s iTunes will sell EMI’s music catalog without protection against copying. It is AAC, not MP3.

The New York Times Store
Forever Fab Beatles Commemorative
Forever Fab Beatles Commemorative

I

Famous Columnist left Los Angeles Times

Al Martinez pushed out by Times

MartinezColumnist Al Martinez has been with the Los Angeles Times more than 30 years and, despite being exiled to the back of the features section several years ago, is one of the paper's most recognized bylines. He has written for TV and authored many books. We share Angel City Press as a book publisher, and previously shared L.A. Times Books, so I have co-inhabited a few book signing events with Martinez and each time have marveled at the crowds he draws. Well, he revealed in an angry farewell email to his Times colleagues this evening that the editors told him to take the buyout or else. His hurt missive concludes that "I think I deserved a better way of ending such a long and honorable career." His last column for the Times is June 1.

His email follows:

From: Martinez, Al
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 5:19 PM
Subject: buyout

To all: I dislike rumors and so I take these means to tell you all that I am a victim of the buyout/layoff frenzy. My final column for a newspaper I have worked for since 1972, in a business I have been a part of since 1952, winning more awards and honors than would ever fit on my wall, will be Friday, June 1st. I always thought that I would be the one to decide when it was time to walk away, when my prose faltered and my thinking blurred. But that's not the way it works anymore with the owners we have in the climate that exists. Too bad. I think I deserved a better way of ending such a long and honorable career.

Martinez is not the only veteran pushed to apply for the buyout, just the first to go public.

2007年5月25日星期五

It's time to let google pay

Zell Wants End to Web's Free Ride


By Frank Ahrens and Karl VickWashington Post Staff WritersSaturday, April 7, 2007; Page D01

It's time for newspapers to stop giving away their stories to popular search engines such as Google, according to Samuel Zell, the real estate magnate whose bid for Tribune Co. was accepted this week.

In conversations before and after a speech Zell delivered Thursday night at Stanford Law School in Palo Alto, Calif., the billionaire said newspapers could not economically sustain the practice of allowing their articles, photos and other content to be used free by other Internet news aggregators.

"If all of the newspapers in America did not allow Google to steal their content, how profitable would Google be?" Zell said during the question period after his speech. "Not very."
Newspapers have allowed Google to use their articles in exchange for a small cut of advertising revenue, but search engines also help to distribute their content to wider online audiences. Google and Yahoo have financial arrangements with wire services, such as the Associated Press, to provide news stories and photos. Yesterday, Google settled a copyright-infringement lawsuit with Agence France-Presse, which had alleged that Google posted news summaries, headlines and photos without permission.

Tribune owns 16 newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune and Baltimore Sun, in addition to 26 radio and television stations and other properties. The company's newspaper Web sites have made little economic impact. In December, Times management called the paper's Web site a "feeble online presence."

On Monday, Tribune accepted Zell's bid -- slightly more than $13 billion, including debt -- to buy Tribune and take the company private with the aid of an employee stock-ownership plan. Zell's bid loads the troubled company with a debt 10 times greater than its 2007 anticipated cash flow, nearly twice that of the most highly leveraged newspaper companies.

As a consequence, Zell may be forced to sell Tribune properties or take on partners to reduce debt. He already has spoken to entertainment mogul David Geffen, who wants to buy the Los Angeles Times or enter into a joint-venture partnership with Zell for control of the paper.
Zell said the current arrangement between newspapers and search engines "can last for a short time," but not longer. "We're going to see new formulas in the immediate [future] that reflect the cost benefit," he said.

At a reception before the speech, Zell appeared uncomfortable when asked about reports that he was talking with Geffen. He said he had met Geffen only once, and that was socially. (Both own Malibu beach houses.) When a reporter observed that he appeared disinclined to say more, Zell said, "You think so? Or do I have to say it for you re-a-l-l-y slow?"

But he nodded solemnly when it was observed that the situation at the Times, which has bristled under Tribune management, appears serious. "I know it is," he said, and his manner changed to indicate that the matter had his attention. Last fall, Tribune leadership ousted the Times' editor and publisher, inflaming newsroom enmity toward Chicago.

Zell said Tribune has "suffered a lot over the last three or four years" because of "internecine" warfare between the Times and its Chicago overseers. "That will dramatically change," he said.
Zell was asked whether he regarded the news business as carrying a level of public trust not necessarily found in rail cars or container leasing, prior business ventures of Zell's. He nodded emphatically in agreement.

"It's a trade-off," he said. "Total freedom for the newsroom and total discipline everywhere else" in the company.

In a related matter, Tribune filed its proxy with the Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday, showing that the company paid chief executive Dennis J. FitzSimons $6.3 million last year. In addition to a salary of $999,000, FitzSimons received a $1.4 million bonus, $3.8 million in stock options and other perquisites.
Vick reported from Palo Alto, Calif.